Texans forced to roll with Slaton & Taylor

Taylor's name is in the headline because we have a picture of him
First the Texans wasted their time, resources, and roster spots on Ahman Green and Chris Brown. It's possible they'll get nothing in return, the way Green is going. Now they are forced to start Steve Slaton before they wanted to. Perhaps it will be a blessing in disguise, but it may be too much for the rookie to handle. The only safe bet is that Chris Taylor will start a game at some point for Houston. Darius Walker might too before this is over. This has a way of happening with the Houston running game.
Houston was one of the few teams I watched twice in the preseason, primarily because I was curious about Slaton and Taylor. They both show flashes of being effective roles players, especially Slaton, but I don't think they are ready to handle the load on their own. The Texans probably feel the same way.
Slaton averaged 3.3 yards-per-touch against the Steelers. And almost all of his damage came in the fourth quarter - by the time Byron Leftwich was at quarterback for Pittsburgh. Before that point, Slaton had seven rushes for 14 yards. If Slaton starts slow, look for Slaton and Chris Taylor to share touches evenly, just like they did in the third preseason game. Against Baltimore, he's probably going to start slow.
I saw enough versatility and surprising power in the preseason to think that Slaton can be effective as a lead back in a committee. But he's not ready for Baltimore. Chris Perry, another role player asked to start, found out the hard way. Expect Slaton to do the same.





Comments
u guys sure did a good job hyping him up in the pre-season...now he starts and he's not ready? CJ was ready in Tenn, Forte was ready in Chi, heck, even Tim Hightower looked ready last week....and you say Slaton isn't ready---I understand his situation facing perhaps the toughest D of the season. But, isn't that a good test for the rookie? If he can have a decent day vs. the Ravens, he'll prove himself to me.
Posted by: Jacob Lester | September 12, 2008 02:04 AM
I'm lovin' the Slaton, he's just as ready as Forte, C Johnson, Felix, K Smith only difference being they started against weaker defenses. Taylor is an inexperienced fullback not a tailback so wouldn't think he's any better prepared as the article implies
Posted by: steve | September 12, 2008 07:04 AM
Oh I think Slaton is more ready than Taylor, who can be a decent backup/short-yardage/bull runner type. They can help each other splitting. For what its worth, Taylor has never actually played fullback until some practices this summer and they gave up on that.
And honestly, i wish i hyped Slaton more in preseason - we certainly didnt rank him very high. I just dont think he's a true starter like some of the other guys like Forte, CJ, Stewart when he gets shot.
Posted by: Gregg | September 12, 2008 09:33 AM
Now i am stuck on who to start. Ricky Williams or Slaton??
Posted by: Jason Van Eeuwen | September 12, 2008 09:46 AM
is ricky williams still startable?
Posted by: scott c | September 12, 2008 11:12 AM
On a team decimated by injuries, do you start Taylor? or would a guy like pierre thomas be a better start?
Posted by: sse | September 12, 2008 11:41 AM
Of that group, I'd go
Slaton
Ricky
Thomas
Taylor
None are in top 30.
Posted by: gregg | September 12, 2008 12:10 PM